Leninism and Bioleninism

Summary:

Leninism began with the notion that political parties are more effective in orchestrating political activities than individuals.
Further, political parties attract a certain type of person - that type that obeys, and therefore can be trusted.
Leninism grew from these principles, emphasizing structured control and organization within political movements.
Once a party secures power, it will notice there is power to be had outside of parliament as well. (Executive, judiciary, the press, education, etc.)

Bio-Leninism extends the traditional Leninist approach by incorporating biological differences and societal statuses into its strategy.
Some people just aren't capable of being successful at capitalism.
Leninism focuses on gathering support from individuals considered low-status in society by promising them elevated status through political change.
This approach leverages the inherent social and biological disparities among people to fuel its political momentum.

The concept of the "invisible hand" suggests that individuals seeking personal gain in an unrestricted environment contribute to the economy's overall efficiency.
Similarly, in politics, the pursuit of power in a free political environment leads to the formation of structures designed to capture and consolidate that power.

Firms exist to reduce transaction costs and establish trust among economic actors, which individual transactions lack.
This concept parallels political parties, which organize and streamline political efforts more efficiently than solitary individuals.

Political parties don't need to do anything except be able to recruit committed people.
Being unreasonable gets more loyal followers than being reasonable. This is true on both sides and leads to divergence between the sides.
They emerged as mechanisms to systematically acquire power within parliaments and beyond.
The expansion of these parties into various societal sectors demonstrates the relentless pursuit of power beyond initial political aims.

Socialism offered a refined approach to mobilizing low-status individuals by promising them a reversal of their fortunes.
Reasonable, normal-ish people have a lot of options in society. Outcasts need commitment to a crazy plan.
The ideology aligned closely with the interests of those discontented with their societal status under capitalism, providing a broad base of support.

Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937) was an Italian Marxist/Communist agitator, who wrote mostly while in prison.
Gramsci proposed a gradual conquest of cultural and educational institutions to reshape societal norms and values in favor of leftist ideologies.
This "long march through the institutions" (aka the War of Positions) aimed to infiltrate and dominate various power structures without direct confrontation or revolution.

The West witnessed the emergence of a more distributed form of Leninism, focusing on cultural dominance rather than outright political control.
This approach has led to the progressive infiltration and influence over education, media, and other key societal institutions.

As societal conditions evolved, leftist strategies adapted to focus not on economic class struggle but on elevating those with various forms of low status.
These people are pissed and resentful at anything "normal" in society, and they will do all they can to mess with society.
This shift reflects the continuous adaptation of leftist strategies to recruit support from diverse social groups (those people who will never make it on their own for any reason).
In a free society, the politics always move to the left.

Despite the diffusion of leftist ideology across various sectors, the ultimate goal remains the concentration of power.
The absence of a unified leader or party to stabilize this concentration of power has led to a continuous leftward drift in Western politics.

The trajectory of Leninism and its offshoots underscores a relentless pursuit of power, utilizing both political organization and societal divisions.
The ongoing influence of these ideologies suggests a profound impact on the structure and dynamics of power within society, continually evolving to incorporate new strategies and targets.

#nrx #bioleninism